James Ashton: You can legislate for top pay but it doesn’t seem to work
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I am doubtful that the EU commissioner Michel Barnier has cracked the executive pay puzzle with his latest clampdown.
It is true that boardroom pay has spiralled far faster than that of the average worker. But measuring the gap from the top to bottom of the company is meaningless if you try to compare Tesco, and its army of till workers, with the chipmaker Arm Holdings, which employs far fewer staff but a greater proportion of highly skilled ones.
More worrying is that a binding vote on pay seems to be having little effect on regular transgressors. BP’s attitude to executive remuneration, a flashpoint at this week’s annual meeting, seems to be going backwards. Far better for investors to take the matter in hand themselves, instead of introducing another code. What went on behind the scenes at the education group Pearson, which recanted on discretionary pay awards, suggests this is already happening.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments