Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Is Woolworth's coming back? Don't believe the hype

Former MD Tony Page says he wants to create a chain of neighbourhood stores if he can persuade the brand's owner to part with it. But if the demand was out there, he could do that without calling it Woolworths

James Moore
Chief Business Commentator
Monday 24 April 2017 11:33 BST
Comments
Woolworth's in the shopping precinct of Kirkby New Town, Lancashire, in 1967
Woolworth's in the shopping precinct of Kirkby New Town, Lancashire, in 1967 (George W Hales/Fox Photos/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Is Woolworths about to roar back on to the High Street? Tony Page, a former of MD of the chain, says he has approached the brand’s owner Shop Direct about taking it on, nearly a decade after its ignominious collapse at the cost of 27,000 jobs.

Best known for its “pick ’n’ mix” sweets, there was quite the public outpouring of sorrow when the debt laden chain - in a £400m hole at the end - finally closed its doors.

Dodgy finances, and equally dodgy management, played their part in its demise, but the biggest problem faced by Woolies was that too few of those who mourned its departure ever darkened its doors.

A decade on, can Mr Page change that by reviving the name and format, focussing it on "neighbourhood stores" at the heart of communities rather than big out of town malls?

Let’s assuming he can pull that off a deal to get hold of it, and then put together a suitable financing package.

You can just about see where he's coming from.

Excepting the internet, the biggest growth in grocery over the last decade has been in the "convenience" sector. Smaller format stores close to where people live.

These have driven the revival of another previously struggling retailer (the Co-op), and done great business for the likes of Tesco and Sainsbury's, while causing a late to the party Morrisons to waste tens of millions of pounds trying to play catch up until new boss David Potts pulled the plug.

If it can work for food retail, why not general retail? If you’re smart with your locations, targeting areas of high footfall, places where people might be persuaded to stop off on the way home to pick up bits and bobs, as they do now with food from their local Co-op? Who knows?

Stock things people want, at prices they’re happy pay, and make it convenient for them and they will come! But that's the trick, isn't it. If only it were so simple.

Have you spotted the flaw in Mr Page's logic yet? If the sort of retailer he's proposing were a viable proposition, then surely someone would have taken the plunge with something like it by now. Or at least quietly trialled it in a few likely locations.

But perhaps the entire retail market has simply failed to pick up on some untapped demand? If so, why does Mr Page need the Woolworths name to show 'em what they're missing?

Woolworths carries with it some brand recognition, at least among shoppers of a certain age, and of course, there's the PR value. But you could easily say you're reviving the format while calling it something else and still get some coverage for your efforts.

Mr Page has come up with a nice distraction from a depressing general election campaign and perhaps we should thank him for that, if nothing else.

But we don't really need to do even that, because the publicity he has generated for himself should be its own reward. After all, he’s between jobs at the moment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in