By hitting Google with a £4bn fine, Margrethe Vestager has proved herself to be the EU's Harry Kane
The details of the latest penalty matter less than the competition commissioner's intent, which is to bring Silicon Valley to heel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Margrethe Vestager is the Harry Kane of the European Commission, a star striker without whom it would be much diminished.
The latest evidence for this comes with the €4.34bn (£3.9bn) anti-trust bomb she has dropped on Google.
The penalty was imposed after EU regulators found it to have abused the dominance of its Android operating system, a favourite among mobile phone makers not named Apple, to cement its dominance in web search.
Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has 90 days to either change its business practices or face further penalties of up to 5 per cent of its average global daily turnover.
You won’t be surprised to learn that Google CEO Sundar Pichai issued a robust defence of the company’s business practices via a blogpost.
We’ve given the consumer choice, he said.
And the consumer has often chosen Google. That's because its products are very good.
The problem, as Ms Vestager sees it, comes when they are bundled together, to the exclusion of potential rivals who might give the market a bit of competitive vim.
But really, the technicalities of the case are far less important than the intent, which is to bring the tech giants to heel and ensure that they face a degree of regulatory oversight that no one else seems willing or able to impose at this juncture.
This very necessary. Google and its fellow Silicon Valley titans are at the forefront of a new industrial revolution and they have appalling power over us and the markets they serve.
The frequently enjoy a monopoly, or a virtual monopoly, position and monopolies are a dangerous thing.
This is the second mega fine issued by Ms Vestager against the company. A previous penalty of €2.4bn, was imposed following a probe into the company’s shopping comparison service.
With cash reserves of more than $100bn (£77bn) burning a hole in its corporate pocket, Google can easily wear both penalties, not to mention a potential third that could be on the way through another investigation into its AdSense ad placing operation.
The first of the fines is being appealed and Google has indicated that it will do the same with regard to the latest penalty.
This is inevitably going to be a long drawn out process, with the EU and America’s deteriorating relationship and trade battle a potential complicating factor.
That won’t worry Ms Vestager overly. She gives every impression that she can cope with a bowl full of rusty nails for breakfast, and more besides. Ultimately if she scores a win, it should benefit us all, even the fools on this island who want to replace her with a lesser spotted Boris Johnson.
In the meantime, we probably ought to do our bit to help her by making a little more use of Google’s rivals, such as Microsoft’s Bing, which is a perfectly serviceable search engine.
But we probably won’t, so we’ll just have to rely on Ms Vestager’s steely determination to bring this one home.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments