Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Given Standard Chartered’s troubles with watchdogs, its chief executive wasn’t about to steam in alongside HSBC’s chairman, Douglas Flint, over regulators being mean to banks.
No matter, because Antonio Horta-Osorio has stepped into the breach on Sky News. Mr Horta-Osorio fretted that some of the reforms planned by watchdogs could “incentivise people to do nothing”. Like Mr Flint, he fears bankers will avoid taking risks for fear of the consequences should something go wrong.
Both men say they are concerned about the impact of bankers avoiding taking any responsibly for anything, and limiting what they do to selling the odd ultra low-risk deposit account to customers.
It should be remembered, here, that Lloyds only recently ditched a target-based remuneration scheme for sales staff that led one hapless employee to mis-sell life insurance policies that he couldn’t afford to himself. He was far more fearful of his bosses than of the watchdogs. Lloyds traders also tried to cheat the Bank of England out of fees for participating in a scheme that kept it trading. As we all know, HSBC was fined nearly $2bn for acting as a conduit for Mexican drug money. They may both have been in the thick of more wrongdoing if their risk warnings are anything to go by.
It is hard not to ask whether either of these two men get it yet. It’s not risk-averse bankers doing nothing because of a big bad regulator we should be concerned about.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments