David Prosser: The banks are recovering but at borrowers' expense
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Remember the good old days of playing the mortgage lenders for fools? There was a time, in the pre-credit crunch world, when promiscuous borrowers hopped from lender to lender, exploiting their short-term, loss-leading fixed ordiscounted rate offers, and then moved on to the next conquest before the more expensivestandard variable rate (SVR) kicked in.
Those days are gone. One piece of good news trumpeted by Lloyds Banking Group yesterday was an improvement in its margins. The gain is explained by an ever-increasing number of mortgage customers who are coming off the cheap deals that lured them to the lender a few years back and who are being moved on to its higher SVR. There they are stuck because no lender – including Lloyds itself – offers a deal that undercuts that default rate. Lloyds' SVR is actually just 3.5 per cent, a price of which mortgage borrowers could only dream in all but the most recent past. Still, at seven times the Bank of England's 0.5 per cent base rate, you can see why Lloyds – and the same is true of other lenders – is enjoying an uplift in its margins.
Lloyds' gain is customers' loss, of course, and borrowers would be within their rights to ask whether they are being exploited. The other side of the argument is that it was the years of easy credit, when lenders chased borrowers at any price, which led to the crisis in the first place.
It's the same argument in the SME sector, where businessescontinue to complain about lack of access to credit despite the banks' claims that they are lending. Lloyds' commitment is that it will not turn down a borrowing request from any creditworthy business, while its rivals have made similar pledges. Explaining that contradiction may just be a matter of pointing out that creditworthiness is a subjective matter and that an offer of credit may still be no use if it is not affordable. Wherever the exact truth of the issue lies, the wider point is that for SMEs, like mortgage borrowers, there is little prospect of a return to the pre-crisis days of much easier credit.
We can argue about the rights and wrongs of this changed world. Certainly it seems tough thatborrowers who would once have been welcomed with open arms now find themselves spurned. But for Lloyds, the context is the need to shrink the balance sheet and to repay the support extended to it by central banks during the dark days. These will remain the priority for the foreseeable future.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments