David Prosser: Sainsbury's pension plan will be copied
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook The move announced yesterday by Sainsbury to transfer £750m worth of property into an arrangement that will generate £35m of income each year for the grocer's pension scheme is an imaginative one. It should provide the scheme's trustees with greater security while also reducing the cost to the company of getting down the £1.2bn funding deficit in the plan.
Indeed, thanks to the property transfer, Sainsbury's has to raise its annual pension contribution by only £11m, despite the trebling in the size of the deficit over the past three years.
The deal does, however, have to be approved by the Pensions Regulator. There's no reason to think it won't be, but there will be plenty of other companies watching the decision. PricewaterhouseCoopers says more than 30 large employers are currently considering arrangements of this type, with assets worth more than £5bn potentially for pension funds. Much, then, rests on the Sainsbury's plan.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments