David Prosser: Let's hear the Rolls-Royce roar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Outlook Qantas's launch of legal action against Rolls-Royce yesterday provided critics of the British engineering company with fresh ammunition. They question whether Rolls-Royce has taken a sufficiently tight grip of what could still be a public relations disaster.
Those who equate Rolls-Royce's problems with the fate that befell BP earlier this year exaggerate the point. No one has died and there has been no environmental disaster. And while Rolls-Royce's share price has fallen since the Qantas incident, there has hardly been the sort of collapse we saw at BP, not least because a string of lucrative new contracts have been unveiled. Indeed, Qantas's first legal claim yesterday was not sufficient to stop Rolls-Royce shares rising.
And yet the radio silence from the company remains deafening. True, it did make a statement yesterday specifically addressing the findings of an Australian safety board's review, but there was no attempt to counter the Qantas threat. Right from the moment news broke that a Qantas plane had been forced to make an emergency landing because of a failure in a Rolls-Royce engine, the company's executives have been conspicuous by their absence.
This is the way Rolls-Royce operates from Sir John Rose, its chief executive, down. Discretion is often admirable, but companies also have a duty to explain themselves – not least for the sake of their shareholders. Having surrendered the airwaves during this episode, Rolls-Royce may find it tough to get on the front foot if matters take a turn for the worse.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments