CYBG set for Virgin merger but consumers shouldn't get too excited over 'super challenger' bank
Offer isn't great for Virgin Money shareholders either but CYBG is the only game in town
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CYBG looks like it’s going to succeed with its bid to create what could, if you were feeling very charitable, be described as a “super challenger” bank via a merger with Virgin Money.
The owner of the Clydesdale and Yorkshire banks has tabled a sweetened proposal, which can best be described as “uninspiring”.
It would give Virgin shareholders 1.2125 CYBG shares for each share they hold, up from 1.1297 when it made its first strike last month.
Because CYBG shares have fallen in the intervening period the offer is actually now worth less in cash terms than the original. However, it gives Virgin Money 38 per cent of the combined group, up from 36.5 per cent, so represents a small but significant upgrade.
In the view of Ian Gordon, one of the smartest banking analysts on the block, what’s on the table is still wildly skewed towards CYBG investors. But it has proved enough to get Virgin Money bosses around the table.
Why? The only other plausible buyer, Spain’s Sabadell, is basically out of the running after its botched attempt to shift its UK challenger bank TSB on to IT new platform.
CYBG is thus the only game in town, and a combination of the two would allow bosses to knock out a big chunk of cost. Combined, they’d also have a better chance of taking on the big five (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds, RBS and Santander).
Mr Gordon reckons Virgin shares are undervalued, even after having risen recently, and he’s right. But there’s a reason for that: The market doesn’t think much of Virgin Money’s prospects as an independent entity.
That being the case, I’d bet on another small sweeter to get its board to sign on the dotted line, and a nice bung for Sir Richard Branson for licensing the Virgin brand, which the enlarged CYBG would like to use.
As for consumers? There is considerable appetite out there for a bank that does things differently, and doesn’t treat them as an after thought at best.
Whether this “super challenger” will do that is an open question. Remember, TSB was supposed to be a bold new banking force, only for it to turn out to be anything, as its disastrous handling of that IT fiasco proved.
Cutting costs will be CYBG Virgin’s top priory if and when this deal gets done. Cuddling customers will have to wait on that.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments