Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Climate change can wait for too many investors in oil

Outlook

James Moore
Wednesday 20 January 2016 02:32 GMT
Comments
Oil futures haven fallen more than 18 per cent so far this month in the steepest decline since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008
Oil futures haven fallen more than 18 per cent so far this month in the steepest decline since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 (Corbis)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Want to know why rock-bottom oil prices are a bad thing? A group of investors led by New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and the Church Commissioners for England have signed a motion calling on ExxonMobil to disclose the resilience of its business model in the wake of the Paris agreement on climate change.

They and a group of co-signatories hold more than $1bn (£700m) in Exxon shares between them. So while they’re not big guns in investment terms, they have clout.

And they’re raising an important issue. The Paris agreement was signed because it was very necessary. So it’s pertinent to raise it with companies whose activities and products result in enormous amounts of carbon being belched into the atmosphere.

Let’s assume Exxon were inclined to listen – and, for the record, it has pointed to work it says it has already done on climate change. Its problem is that it is having to grapple with making money at a time when oil is as cheap as chips.

The big guns of investment are far more concerned about the large losses they’re sitting on than climate change. They will be pressing Exxon to cut costs, preserve dividends and the devil take the hindmost.

That sort of attitude spells trouble for us all in the long term. While the motion’s signatories see that, too many in investment circles suffer from environmental myopia.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in