Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ben Chu: Wading through Thames' muddy waters

Ben Chu
Friday 14 June 2013 00:48 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook If Thames Water's product was as opaque as its accounts Londoners wouldn't relish turning on their taps.

Dive into those financial statements this week and one discovers 2012/13 revenues of £1.79bn, costs of £1.24bn and an operating profit of £549m. But this operating profit is eroded by interest payments on a large loan from two financing companies, one of them based in the Cayman Islands, leaving a taxable profit of just £150m. And the corporation tax payable on this surplus is entirely offset by capital investment allowances.

But what about those loans? The chairman of the water regulator, Jonson Cox, has warned that some water companies are using high-coupon intra-company loans to reduce their tax bills. Is Thames Water one of them? Good luck finding out. There are not only the two finance companies to investigate to get an answer but also a long ladder of parent companies. There are 11 companies in total in the "Thames Water Utilities Financing Group". What purpose does this morass of financial engineering serve, if not to avoid tax and obscure the public's view of what is taking place? If Mr Cox wants to reform the industry, he should start by insisting the utility firms' accounts are as transparent as the stuff coming out of the taps.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in