Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ben Chu: The good banker has good timing

Outlook

Ben Chu
Friday 08 March 2013 04:13 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Speaking of Keynes, John Maynard argued the definition of a good banker is one who manages to time his ruin to coincide with that of all his peers so he does not get singled out for blame.

Andrew Bailey, the new head of the Prudential Regulatory Authority, offered some support to that cynical interpretation of the profession's survival instincts while giving evidence to Andrew Tyrie's Banking Standards Committee this week.

Mr Bailey noted that in the wake of the Barings collapse in 1995 senior directors were disqualified under the Companies Act. But no one since the present financial credit fiasco – not even Fred Goodwin – has been similarly disqualified. "Why not?" Mr Bailey asked the committee in a rhetorical fashion. "I don't know the answer." Safety in numbers, as Keynes observed, is the likely reason. But it's hardly a satisfactory one for the public which is suffering from the consequences of the actions of these greedy and incompetent individuals.

So what to do? The UK regulator can only ban someone from working in the industry if they have broken a specific financial regulation. Disqualifying someone because they have proved themselves useless enough to destroy a bank under the provisions of the Companies Act is a job for Vince Cable's Business Department. Mr Bailey apparently feels the Government should pull its finger out and start striking off the multiple culprits of the 2008 disaster. Sir Mervyn King said this week that the great lesson of the crisis is that politicians need to start backing regulators unequivocally. Over to you then, Vince…

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in