Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ben Chu: Forget the bleats about those banking bonuses

 

Ben Chu
Friday 15 March 2013 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook Others, however, seem to be going backwards. For some reason Andrew Bailey has chosen to throw his weight behind the inalienable right of UK banks to pay their staff bonuses many multiples of their basic salaries. He brandished a back-of-an-envelope calculation before the Treasury Select Committee this week in his confirmation hearing as the new boss of the Prudential Regulation Authority.

He suggested the new European Union bonus cap could result in the banks hiking fixed pay by an aggregate of £500m a year. Is this supposed to be impressive? My own back-of-an-envelope calculation shows that the total staff costs of the four biggest banks (RBS, Barclays, Lloyds and HSBC) in 2012 were £44.5bn.

If readers will excuse yet another scatological metaphor, in the context of such vast costs that extra £500m sounds about as significant as a fart in a hurricane. Mr Bailey has inadvertantly confirmed that the EU intervention on pay will make next to no difference to the size of the cost bases of our banks.

We now know that the bleats about the cap making our financial institutions more precarious is mere industry scaremongering.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in