Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bean counters must be held to account too

 

James Moore
Thursday 24 April 2014 02:17 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Outlook Should the accountancy profession be running scared of its regulator? Only if the bosses of the big-four audit firms take flight at the prospect of being slapped by a piece of wet lettuce.

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has just unveiled its plan and budget for the next year, and the announcement encapsulates where the organisation is going wrong.

Now remember, the FRC is the body that oversees the UK Combined Code on Corporate Governance which operates on the basis that companies either comply or explain to their investors why not.

The FRC says it wants companies that don't comply to offer better explanations and it wags a stern finger at how accounts are presented while saying that disclosures are often confusing and poorly set out.

In that case you'd think it would be setting an example with its own disclosures. Yet despite the FRC moaning about pressures on its budget in its announcement, it somehow manages to omit what its budget will actually amount to. It also fails to explain what a 25 per cent increase in audit inspections means in practice.

For the record inspections should rise to 125 from 100, and the budget from £27.2m to £32.1m. The information can be gleaned only by picking through the broader, 32-page plan and budget document, supplied as a PDF file.

The "plan" part of that file has the tone of a mildly disappointed schoolmaster telling a pupil he could do with trying a bit harder.

Given how the financial crisis shook public confidence in the audit profession you'd hope for a little more meat on the bones.

But should it be a surprise this is lacking? Look at who's running the organisation. Its chief executive, Stephen Haddrill, is an ex-civil servant turned trade-body boss (the Association of British Insurers).

His chairman, Sir Win Bischoff, is a former investment banker, Lloyds Banking Group chairman and a pillar of Britain's financial establishment. He is just about the last person you'd expect to see riding roughshod over the auditors he's spent so much of his life working with.

It's worth noting that these men aren't the sort you would expect to see at, say, America's Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. They tend to be rather eminent lawyers who have worked in rather eminent institutions and have had regulatory responsibilities in the past. It's also overseen by the Securities & Exchange Commission, not known for its lightness of touch, and was established after the Enron scandal.

The events of the financial crisis which led to the FRC taking on an expanded role were no less scandalous. So too is the FRC's tepid response to the fallout from them.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in