Anthony Hilton: Worrying division over pension schemes' future
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I attended an interesting pensions meeting on Tuesday evening – though I am sure many of you will think that is an oxymoron – but it was thoroughly depressing. Most big companies have already, or will shortly, close their final salary pension scheme, and the discussion was about what they could put in its place.
This was where the meeting split – the big quoted companies talked about "trying to do the right thing" – by which they meant being relatively generous in the way they match the contributions of employees into private pensions. But to the others in the room it was all about cost and how they could minimise the number of people in the scheme and for whom they had to pay contributions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments