Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Anthony Hilton: Westminster cannot deny Scots their own pound

 

Anthony Hilton
Saturday 15 February 2014 01:57 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The strongest political message of the week was that the Scots would not be allowed to keep the pound if they voted for independence. George Osborne told them; Danny Alexander told them; Ed Balls told them. One each from Tory, Liberal Democrat and Labour.

But it is rubbish. When the Irish Free State was created just over 91 years ago, its currency was the Irish pound. It remained the currency until the country joined the euro in 1999.

There were no formal currency links between Britain and Ireland, but throughout the Irish pound traded at a slight discount to sterling and when the British devalued in 1949 and 1967, Dublin did too.

Also, when the British went decimal in 1971, the Irish did the same thing at the same time and with the same new coinage. There was nothing the British could do to stop them and none of this nonsense about the Irish having to constrain their banking and taxation system, because while the user thought the currency was more or less the same, it was separate politically and economically.

While Westminster can stop the Scots being part of the sterling currency area, which the Bank of England oversees, it certainly cannot stop them having a separate currency called the Scottish pound, which from the voters’ perspective would be identical to the Scottish pounds circulating today.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in