Anthony Hilton: One over the eight means you start to lose control
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.On a similar theme on Wednesday evening, I sat in briefly on a seminar run by Board Intelligence, one of the best of that breed of advisory organisation, where various people from business backgrounds talked about ways the running of our companies might be improved.
One of the observations was that boards become less and less effective as they get bigger, because beyond a certain size directors will assume someone else around the table knows what is going on, and therefore they do not feel the need to understand the issues themselves. The chances are then that no one understands.
Six is the optimum number and certainly no more than eight – which perhaps explains why, with about 30 people attending Cabinet meetings, we are so badly governed. It also explains, of course, why the big boards of banks were hopeless at understanding and controlling the risks in those businesses.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments