Anthony Hilton: Flawed plan to rebuild Britain with no money
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government wants the private sector to finance the huge costs of nuclear power stations and hopes French company EDF will shortly kick off its new build.
This continues to be its public position in spite of the high casualty rate among rival companies – like Centrica and the the private sector – to finance the huge costs of nuclear power stations.
This marks a further unravelling in the Government's grand plan to rebuild Britain's infrastructure without spending any money and, sooner or later, it is going to have to accept that it is not going to work. Some things are just too big for individual companies to handle because they risk being wiped out.
Unfortunately the longer the Treasury and Chancellor keep up the pretence that things are otherwise, the less that gets built, the more the UK's potential for future growth is undermined. And what makes this doubly silly is that the Government has already told potential suppliers that customers will pay a higher rate for nuclear electricity than they will for power generated from other sources, as a way to cover these costs. So we are – or will – pay a nuclear tax anyway.
All this manoeuvring is to keep the cost off the Government balance sheet but it adds huge costs in complexity, uncertainty and delay. It really is no way to run a country which seeks to be competitive in the 21st century.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments