Anthony Hilton: Byrne’s right on pension funds – bigger is better
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.To Birmingham for an interesting speech from Liam Byrne – he who as a member of the Labour Government Treasury team famously left the note after the 2010 election warning the incoming Chancellor there was no money left.
Mr Byrne's thesis was that we have far too many small pension schemes and rules should be introduced to force them to merge into larger, more efficient units.
In this he is surely correct. In small schemes, costs and charges eat up the bulk of the investment returns which mean members get lower pensions than they should. The country also suffers.
In Canada, the Netherlands and elsewhere, huge pension funds finance big, long-term housing and infrastructure projects which deliver huge, economic benefit.
Here, most pension funds are too small to take such big risks so they miss out on the big returns, the country does not get the infrastructure and the pensioners get short changed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments