Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Comment: The good ship EMU holed below the waterline

Friday 29 September 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

European finance ministers meeting in Valencia this weekend are ostensibly discussing a name for the new Euro-currency and practical details about how to manage the transition to it from the initial fixing of exchange rates and establishment of a European central bank on 1 January, 1999. They might just as well be rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic.

The reality is that a Europe-wide move to monetary union in 1999 now looks holed below the waterline. Despite Helmut Kohl's protestations, key interests within Germany have served notice that they will not be party to a cooked deal on the Maastricht convergence criteria that would include debt-laden and inflation-prone countries like Italy. Of those interests, none packs a bigger punch than the Bundesbank. Officially of course, the bank endorses the move to monetary union. Few doubt, however, that it is reluctant to conspire in its own demise.

As everyone knows, central bankers not only like to remove the punchbowl just as the party gets going, but they are also generally tight-lipped. Not so with the talkative bunch on the Bundesbank council in the past week. Scarcely a day has passed, it seems, without some further hardening in the bank's position on monetary union.

At the beginning of the week it was the turn of its president, Hans Tietmeyer, to insist that political compromises could endanger stability, that codeword for fiscal and monetary responsibility. At the end of the week, it was the turn of Gerd Hausler, a member of the bank's Frankfurt directorate, to raise the ante on sanctions against budget deficits after monetary union.

The Bundesbank does not always get its own way. Helmut Kohl rode roughshod over its opposition to his proposed terms of German monetary union. But it is on surer ground with European monetary union. Despite the common front of party political support and the backing of big banks and large companies for the project, the German public is not convinced: more than two-thirds are opposed to the plan to kill the mark.

On the current timetable, the decision on which countries will qualify for EMU will be taken either at the end of 1997 or in 1998. One factor to bear in mind is that the Bundesbank will be throwing a party - and providing the punchbowl - on 21 June, 1998 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the mark. This is just ahead of the federal elections in October. It will be quite an occasion; the mark has come to be the totem of German economic regeneration since the War. Given the events of the past few days, that party doesn't look like turning into a wake.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in