Clyde ups stakes in oil bid battle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Clyde Petroleum upped the stakes in its increasingly heated pounds 432m bid battle with Gulf Canada yesterday by effectively flagging what it considered to be a fair value price for itself. On the basis of a study by an independent industry consultant, Clyde said a fair trading range for its shares, before any premium for control, would be between 146p and 177p a share.
Assuming investors would expect Gulf to pay extra to gain control of Clyde, the company's calculations suggested it would not be prepared to recommend a take-out price of less than 190p or 200p, well ahead of the 105p that Gulf has so far tabled, and implying a value of at least pounds 782m. Clyde's shares added 2.5p to 121.5p as the market continued to bank on a higher offer from Gulf or a rival bid from a third party.
As expected, Clyde's defence focused on valuation methodology, with Clyde insisting that a multiple of cashflow, the method usually used in North America, best measured its potential value. For the first time it indicated what would be an appropriate cashflow multiple and published a much higher- than-expected estimate of operating cashflow for the year to the end of last month.
Gulf dismissed Clyde's second defence document as "not credible" and said it "contained no positive surprises, contained desperate claims on value, ignored the medium and longer-term production profile of the company and ignored the company's net asset value".
Clyde said a range of 5.3 to 6.4 times cashflow best valued the company, citing figures calculated by oil industry consultants JS Herold, which had put the company in the third quartile of comparable companies on the basis of a number of measures, including return on capital.
Operating cashflow in the year to December 1996, Clyde said, was pounds 127m, representing a 29 per cent increase on the 1995 figure which appeared in the company's first defence document. Discretionary cashflow, after tax and interest, increased by 37 per cent to pounds 113m.
Clyde's latest defensive salvo also included an estimate of net debt at the the end of 1996, showing much lower-than-expected borrowings of pounds 108.4m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments