Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clinton approves British Airways' USAir link

Michael Harrison,Larry Black
Tuesday 16 March 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITISH AIRWAYS' dollars 300m tie-up with USAir was approved by the Clinton administration yesterday despite fierce opposition from the three biggest US carriers, alarmed at the foothold it will give BA in the world's biggest air travel market.

But announcing his decision, Federico Pena, the US Transportation Secretary, warned that in return he expected the existing highly restrictive treaty governing air services between Britain and the US to be renegotiated to give American carriers greater access to the UK.

Under the USAir agreement BA will be allowed to code-share with its US partner. This means that flights from USAir destinations to cities served by BA will be shown as single through services.

Approval for the deal is a key step forward for BA's global ambitions, giving it an important toehold in the US market, which accounts for 40 per cent of world air travel. However, Mr Pena made it clear that the right to code-share is only conditional and that the arrangement will be reviewed again in a year.

Sir Colin Marshall, chairman of BA, expressed delight at the announcement, saying it would mean simplified booking and check-in procedures for passengers on a global route network.

USAir, America's third biggest domestic carrier, handles 55 million passengers a year and flies to 210 destinations. Under the agreement BA has the right to code- share with USAir on 38 of these.

Initially BA will code-share on only three routes. But Sir Colin added: 'We look forward ultimately to linking more domestic flights on USAir to our own worldwide network, providing substantial benefits to the travelling public.'

The decision was greeted with a mixture of disappointment and dismay by the three US airlines opposing the tie- up. One executive at American Airlines, the most vociferous opponent, said it was a classic case of the stable door being locked after the horse had bolted.

Mr Pena's decision not to revoke unilaterally the air treaty between Britain and the US - an option that had been urged on him in some quarters - was welcomed by Virgin Atlantic.

Had the agreement been revoked, Virgin would not have been able to go ahead with plans to expand its US flights this year, starting with a new service from Heathrow to San Francisco.

Existing US law precludes foreign control of US carriers, and Mr Pena said BA's initial investment - it plans to invest an additional dollars 450m in USAir over the next five years - 'does not impair USAir's citizenship' under the current treaty. But he added that the new administration 'has had no role in shaping these laws or negotiating these agreements', hinting strongly that Washington will not renew BA's joint services with USAir unless the UK agrees to important concessions in a new bilateral treaty.

The administration has sponsored a special airline commission that will review US policy towards foreign investment in American carriers, and will make recommendations for a new aviation law to the US Congress later this year.

Meanwhile American Airlines confirmed it might pull out of the under- used Stansted airport unless more flights were allowed there from the US.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in