Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clarke's tough inflation target `is risky'

Nicholas Timmins
Tuesday 17 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kenneth Clarke, the Chancellor, may have set too tight a target for future inflation risking "loss of credibility" if it is not met, the cross-party Treasury and Civil Service Committee warned yesterday.

In an assessment of the Budget, the committee said the Government had failed to meet its own objective in cutting expenditure in the current year, that the much vaunted private finance initiative had proved disappointing and that it was not convinced by the Chancellor's forecast of a big jump in business investment.

The review of the Budget concluded that Mr Clarke's broadly neutral fiscal stance was the appropriate one and that publication of the minutes of his monthly meetings with the Governor of the Bank of England had significantly enhanced the credibility of monetary policy.

There were, however, "some areas of concern" about that "new deal" the committee said, not least the specific target of holding inflation to the lower half of the 1 per cent to 4 per cent range by the end of the parliament. "There is a danger with this,"the committee said. "There are extreme difficulties in predicting and meeting even broad targets for inflation two years hence . . . and to set such a narrow target risks loss of credibility if the target fails to be met."

The target of having inflation below 2.5 per cent "may either force the introduction of a particularly tight monetary policy, dampening the recovery, or cause the Chancellor to break a stated aim which could undermine the credibility of the `new deal' for monetary policy". They recommended that the Central Statistical Office should publish another monthly measure of inflation excluding indirect taxes alongside the retail price index.

The decision to raise alcohol duties was also criticised, because of fears that it could damage the UK industry.

The bigger-than-expected fall in inflation had allowed a cash cut in this year's spending, but in real terms it had continued to grow, the MPs said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in