Clarke questions size of board for European Bank
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ST PETERSBURG, (Reuter) - Kenneth Clarke, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, questioned the size of the board of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, saying cost effectiveness should apply to all areas.
Mr Clarke, in his speech to the annual meeting of the EBRD, set up to aid eastern Europe, welcomed the efforts of the bank's president Jacques de Larosiere to reform the organisation which had a reputation for unneccesary spending.
Mr Clarke questioned the justification for the 23-member board of directors which accounts for 12 per cent of the bank's budget.
The board also has costs not included in that figure such as its share of renting the EBRD's London headquarters.
Bank sources say the issue of reducing the board is gaining momentum and on Monday, US Treasury Under-Secretary Lawrence Summers said the question of number of directors would have to be raised.
But proponents of reform say reducing the board is politically difficult. The bank's 59 members are represented by directors who all have alternates and other staff. In addition, they use resources from the bank.
Cutting the size of the board would mean constituencies would have to be bigger and more countries would be indirectly represented.
One idea for reducing its size is to have a smaller executive resident board to deal with day to day matters while other members could be shipped in to approve projects. There is also a proposal that directors should get more support from their London embassies rather than have separate staff based at the EBRD.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments