City to be asked to dig deep for nuclear power: Private finance sought for Sizewell C reactor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NUCLEAR Electric has appointed Price Waterhouse, the accountancy firm, to help raise private finance for new nuclear power stations. The state-owned generator is also understood to be seeking advice on privatisation, pending the Government's review of the nuclear industry, expected later this year.
The company's chairman, John Collier, has said that privatisation is the only way forward for the nuclear industry. However, Nuclear Electric needs private finance irrespective of privatisation as it hopes for approval to build a second pressurised water reactor at Sizewell in Suffolk.
Sizewell Cwould be similar to its Sizewell B reactor, which is due to come on stream next year, but twice as big. It is expected to cost pounds 3.45bn in 1992 prices. The company accepts that the Government would not pay for it.
Price Waterhouse will assess the commercial viability of new plant and advise the company on a business strategy ahead of the nuclear review.
Nuclear Electric accounts for more than one fifth of the electricity generated in England and Wales, and is expected to overtake PowerGen as the second-largest generator within a few years.
The company benefits from a pounds 1bn annual subsidy raised through a levy on electricity bills, although this is expected to be reduced and abolished by 1998.
The main problem in privatising Nuclear Electric is historic liabilities estimated at pounds 8.5bn related to the nuclear activities of the old Central Electricity Generating Board.
Scottish Nuclear, which has two plants north of the border, also said yesterday that private finance was needed for new power stations, but was less enthusiastic about privatisation. The Scottish company announced a fivefold increase to pounds 65.8m in its net profits last year on sales of pounds 523.5m.
It is the second year of profitability for Scottish Nuclear, which increased its output by 13 per cent and now supplies just under half of all Scotland's electricity.
James Hann, the chairman, said the company was on track to reduce generating costs to its target level of 2.5p per kilowatt hour within the next couple of years.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments