Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City: Guilt-edged

Jeremy Warner
Sunday 31 January 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEVER mind Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, not knowing about last week's interest rate cut until a good two hours after it had happened; according to those who make markets in gilt-edged stocks, the Bank of England was taken unawares, too.

According to them, the unwritten rule in the gilts market is that the Government never cuts interest rates just ahead of an auction of new stock - to do so is certain death to market-makers since invariably they prepare themselves for an auction by going short of stock. If interest rates are cut just ahead of the auction, they get burnt. That is precisely what happened last week - at an estimated cost to market-makers of pounds 25m. The Government has broken almost every other rule of sound market practice over the past 18 months, I guess, so why not this one?

Rubbish, says the Bank. Interest rate cuts have been in the air for weeks, and there is no rule or understanding, written or unwritten, barring the Government from cutting rates ahead of an auction. Market-makers could have hedged their positions but chose not to, no doubt out of greed.

The truth, I suspect, lies somewhere between these two versions. The Bank of England must have warned ministers that the City would be deeply unhappy about a rate cut ahead of a big auction. It would have been failing in its responsibilities had it not. Ministers ignored the warning at their peril.

The Government will need all the help it can get in funding a borrowing requirement of about pounds 1bn a week next financial year. This little fiasco has hardly got it off on the right foot.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in