City funds sue Ernst & Young for negligence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FIVE City funds are suing accountants Ernst & Young over a report the firm prepared concerning a pounds 1.5m investment the funds made in 1988 in an architectural practice, London-based John Taylor & Associates, writes John Willcock.
Lazard Venture Funds, Lazard Funds (Nominees), Midland Bank Trust Corporation, Causeway Capital and Baring Brothers (Guernsey) served a writ on Ernst & Young and the accountants' former incarnation, Ernst & Whinney, last week.
The five funds are suing Ernst & Young for damages for negligence and breach of contract. The firm was asked to carry out a review of John Taylor for the institutions before they invested in it. The reports covered by the legal action date from June 1987 to March 1989.
If the investors win, they will also claim interest, which could be substantial considering the time elapsed since the reports were made.
The case is sensitive because some of the funds, including the Baring fund, still do a lot of business with Ernst & Young.
According to Ernst & Young, John Taylor was a firm of architects based in London's Oxford Street. A spokeswoman for the accountants said that the firm would be strongly contesting the case.
In April 1988, the firm prepared a report on John Taylor and sent it to potential investors and their auditors, she said. The investors put in pounds 1.5m, and more later on. This was at a bouyant time in the property market. Then, in 1989, the building market turned downwards and John Taylor suffered business problems, hitting the investment.
The spokeswoman said: 'This is not a case of negligence on our part, but one of bad timing on the part of the investors.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments