City File: Kleinwort profits rise masks reverses
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE DISMAL performance of Kleinwort Benson since Big Bang will be underlined when the merchant bank announces its 1992 results on Thursday. Although there will be a 10-15 per cent improvement in the pre- tax profits to around pounds 31m, this can be more than accounted for by a lower bad debt charge. The underlying businesses seem to be in decline.
Kleinwort's attempts to become an integrated merchant bank and securities house can hardly be described as a roaring success. It has lost its way relative to S G Warburg, which also followed the integrated route, but more markedly when compared with Schroders, which never developed a significant securities business and concentrated on increasing its merger and acquisitions side.
Phillip Gibbs, merchant banking analyst at BZW, has come up with an interesting comparison. Kleinwort's share price today is nearly 30 per cent lower than it was at Big Bang in 1986. Schroders' is more than 300 per cent higher.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments