Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City & Business: Queens Moat hurdles

Jermey Warner
Sunday 27 February 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

All has gone ominously quiet over the financial restructuring of Queens Moat Houses - so quiet, in fact, that you begin to wonder whether concrete refinancing proposals are ever going to emerge from the complex morass of interlocking problems that make up the sorry tale of this once substantial hotels group. Insiders insist that steady, if plodding, progress is being made but admit that a solution is still months away at best.

The biggest hurdle appears to be the position of mortgage debenture holders. They have first charge over some of the most desirable hotels in the group, including the Royal Crescent in Bath and the Caledonian in Edinburgh. Even so, the debenture portfolio is worth far less than is supposed, such has been the fall in hotel values, and on paper at least the group has an absolute obligation to meet the shortfall from its other assets. If debenture holders were to claim their security, bankers would be left with such poor cover that it would hardly be worth continuing with the restructuring exercise; better to stem the flow of professional fees and overhead costs by calling in the receivers.

Advisers to the group insist that everyone is in the same boat; all classes of lender and stockholder are going to have to make sacrifices if the restructuring is going to work. So far debenture holders have proved surprisingly pliant, a phenomenon perhaps explained by the fact that Queens Moat has been highly successful in keeping arbitrageurs and vulture capitalists off the register of holders.

Normally in these restructurings, such operators are only too vocal in insisting on their rights, writs and fists flying. It can only be a matter of time before they make their entry. That's when things will start to become really hairy.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in