Chairman approved share deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The chairman of Prudential, Sir Brian Corby, was the director who authorised the share dealings that contributed to Mick Newmarch's abrupt departure from Britain's biggest insurer.
The Pru continued to insist yesterday that neither it nor Mr Newmarch had broken the rules of by the Stock Exchange regarding dealings by directors.
The exchange is investigating the sale by Mr Newmarch of just over 200,000 shares in the Pru hours before the Securities and Investments Board published a critical report on the personal pensions industry and the day before the Pru released new business figures showing a sharp decline in UK sales.
Officials from the exchange's surveillance unit contacted the company shortly after the sale, which took place on 25 October.
The company says Mr Newmarch followed the procedure laid down by the Pru, which follows closely the exchange's model code in its listing rules.
The company says Mr Newmarch contacted the company secretary's office on the morning of 25 October, seeking approval for the deal. That day was the last on which he could exercise the options in question.
The company secretary's office was responsible for checking the rules would not be breached and seeking the authorisation of an appropriate director - in the case of the chief executive, the chairman.
The company argues that Mr Newmarch's dealing did not breach the rules because the SIB report and the new business figures were not price-sensitive.
The Stock Exchange's model code states: "A director must not deal in any securities of the listed company during a close period, which is defined as the period of two months immediately proceeding the announcement of interim and annual results, or a month preceeding quarterly results." The rule on price-sensitive information states: "A director must not deal in any securities of the listed company at any time when he is in possession of unpublished price-sensitive information in relation to those securi ties."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments