Cautious backing for EU's steel state aid regime
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The European Union last night agreed a new state aid regime for the steel industry after a compromise deal that will allow Brussels to block subsidies that distort competition but still allow governments to fund closure programmes.
The regime, which will run for five years from next January, was given a cautious welcome by the British Government and British steelmakers.
Britain, supported by Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands, had insisted that the new code be as least as tough as the existing regime for fear that countries in southern Europe would be tempted to unfairly subsidise their steel industries.
The new regime will allow steelmakers to receive aid for research and development projects, environmental protection and partial closure programmes.
The provisions agreed last night are much tougher than those originally proposed by Brussels in March, which some members states had feared would fail to tackle the problem of overcapacity and lead to further pricing wars.
Since 1993 more than pounds 6bn has been paid in state aid to ailing steel companies, mainly in southern Europe, distorting the market and hampering British Steel and other UK producers.
Had EU ministers not agreed on a new regime from 1 January, then all state aid applications would have had to have been vetted individually by the Council of Ministers.
Greg Knight, Britain's industry minister, welcomed the new code, saying: "I am pleased that after some hard negotiations, agreement has been reached on tight state aid to the steel industry. This success has avoided the undesirable prospect of a period without a code which would have encouraged further support for uncompetitive companies and would run counter to the terms of the common market."
The British Iron and Steel Producers Association gave more cautious backing, saying that whether the new code resulted in real and efficient control of state aid would depend on the commission's determination to stamp out competitive distortions.
It said that changes insisted on by the British government had closed the worst loopholes but said it was disappointed that more of the amendments proposed by the UK steel industry had not been adopted.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments