CalEnergy allows for windfall tax
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CalEnergy, the US company that took over Northern Electric last December after a bitter takeover battle, has made a provision against paying Labour's windfall tax which is thought to be in the region of pounds 90m-pounds 100m.
The company's 1996 report, released yesterday, shows CalEnergy, one of six US companies to have snapped up a British regional electricity company, has established a liability against the levy in its latest accounts.
CalEnergy would not disclose the size of the provision but its chief financial officer, John Sylvia, said it was in the middle of a range of estimates by UK analysts. Goldman Sachs estimates that Northern Electric's windfall tax bill will be between pounds 80m and pounds 120m while NatWest Markets puts it at between pounds 85m and pounds 125m.
The CalEnergy reports also show that it will make losses for the next 10 years on a contract Northern Electric entered into to buy supplies from Teesside Power, in which it has a 15.4 per cent stake. The 15-year contract set out "escalating purchase prices" which are above the level it pays in the electricity pool. CalEnergy has a similar provision to cover the estimated losses which will result from the contract which was signed in 1993 and runs until 2008.
In a report published last night, NatWest Markets put the size of the windfall tax at pounds 5bn but says that at that level it would not derail dividend growth or future plans of the utilities.
The analysis shows that by calculating the levy on the basis of shareholder returns up to 1996, Labour could shift almost one-third of the tax burden to foreign companies that have taken over British utilities in the past three years.
If the cut-off point was 1996 then overseas owners of electricity and water companies would pay pounds 1.545bn of the levy. If the tax liability was calculated up to 1995, this sum falls to pounds 884m.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments