CAA seeks more airport slots for big carriers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Civil Aviation Authority has called for sweeping changes in the allocation of take-off and landing slots at European airports. It wants to see more slots given to larger airlines capable of providing sustained competition and seeks wider acceptance of airlines paying each other to trade slots.
The authority said that the current rules fell "a long way short" of stimulating competition and providing support for new competing airlines. Christopher Chataway, chairman, said: "On most routes in Europe there are two airlines accustomed to co-operating rather than competing. What is needed is more third carriers."
He said that, contrary to expectations when the existing rules were introduced in 1993, there had been no great benefit for consumers.
Under European rules, half of all slots becoming available at airports are kept for new airlines that want to provide services not yet available. The CAA argues these are too often handed out in "penny packets" that do not allow the airline to buld up a viable service.
The rules also act against established airlines providing competition by taking on routes they do not already operate.
A report by the CAA shows that many "new entrants" applying for slots at Heathrow in 1994 received far fewer than they required, and at incovenient times. The result was that a large number of slots were returned. Only five of 14 prospective new entrants at Heathrow began passenger services last year and a similar number began serving Gatwick last summer.
The CAA believes that better targeting of the slots - related to the routes where competition is most needed - could help to resolve the issue. It does not advocate confiscating slots held by exisiting airlines or abolishing the traditional "grandfather rights" under which an airline can keep its slots from season to season as long as they are in use.
The CAA is submitting the document to the Government as part of a discussion leading to a review of the rules in 1996. The Government has already set up a working group to establish its position in the European debate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments