Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

C&W courts controversy in Hong Kong

Chris Godsmark Business Correspondent
Tuesday 17 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Controversial proposals to change the name of Mercury Communications, the telephone operator, and Hongkong Telecom are being considered by the new head of their parent company, Cable & Wireless.

One idea under serious discussion by the recently appointed chief executive, Dick Brown, is to rename Mercury and Hongkong Telecom as simply "Cable & Wireless", a brand which means little to ordinary consumers in the UK. Worse still, associating the Cable & Wireless name more prominently with Hongkong Telecom could add damaging imperial connotations to the subsidiary as the British colony prepares to hand over power next year to China.

The rebranding plans are the first fruits of Mr Brown's root and branch review as he battles to define a clear long-term strategy for the group. They are likely to surprise and dismay some insiders who had expected the probe to focus on corporate policy rather than brand identity.

A spokesman yesterday declined to give details of the review, but confirmed that it did involve "reinforcing global identity". He explained: "How that would work is too early to say, but we haven't ruled anything in and we haven't ruled anything out."

The move would end 10 years of brand development by Mercury, which has seen the UK operator spend millions on its ill-fated television advertising campaign using the comedian, Harry Enfield, as the 1940s gentlemen, Mr Grayson and his colleague, Mr Cholmondeley-Warner.

Mercury's subsequent retrenchment, with the loss of 2,500 jobs, is seen as having dented its image, but advertising experts said it remained a much more visible brand than Cable & Wireless.

"At least Mercury is modern," said Tom Rodwell from the advertising agency Court Burkitt. "If you asked people in the street what Cable & Wireless is, most of them either wouldn't know or would think it was something old-fashioned."

Mr Brown has kept a low public profile since he took over as Cable & Wireless chief executive in July, following the acrimonious split between his predecessor, James Ross, and Lord Young. He has spent the past few months touring the group's businesses and is thought to have given preliminary support to plans by Mercury to raise investment from around pounds 300m to pounds 500m for an expansion of its local wire network.

Separately, Mercury yesterday announced a deal to supply phone line capacity to Pipex, the Internet access provider.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in