Bust bank payouts increased
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NIC CICUTTI
The Bank of England is to improve protection for account-holders in banks that go bust by increasing the maximum amount of compensation they can get to 90 per cent of a pounds 20,000 deposit.
The increase, up to pounds 18,000 from its former 75 per cent ceiling of pounds 15,000, comes into effect on Saturday.
The changes are being made in the wake of a new European Deposit Guarantee Scheme directive, bringing banks in line with similar rules for building societies.
Bank of England officials also said that compensation payments can now be triggered by an order from a liquidator rather than having to wait until the bank goes into full liquidation, as before.
In some cases, the Bank itself may order payments from the scheme.
However, payments will be made only for deposits in banks incorporated in the UK rather than branches of overseas banks trading in this country. Otherwise, compensation will be met by the country where the bank is based.
Had this rule applied at the time of the BCCI collapse, the UK deposit protection scheme, which paid out pounds 77m to account-holders of the failed bank, would not have been liable and compensation would have been met by Luxembourg banking authorities.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments