Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bunhill: Stand or sit?

Dominic Prince
Saturday 17 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TO Stamford Bridge on Thursday evening to watch Chelsea Football Club play against the Czech team, Viktoria Zizkov.

These all-seater stadiums are tedious in the extreme. Before the Taylor report, those who wanted to stand went on the terraces and those who wanted to sit sat. But now everybody has to sit. At least, that is the theory. In fact, what happened on Thursday is that tickets were wrongly allocated, so hundreds of people had to stand in the West Stand, which is inconveniently full of seats. It was chaos, especially as many were waiting to get into the stand for half an hour. Ken Bates (Chelsea chairman and overlord), please note.

THIS, I promise, is true. The story comes from someone who knows about these things. In 1981, Jeffrey Archer was put forward for an honour, a knighthood to be precise. The late Ian Gow, who was at the time Mrs Thatcher's PPS, was consulted by his then boss. Gow thought otherwise.

Intriguingly, Lady Thatcher herself says in her memoirs: 'Jeffrey's political judgement did not always match his tremendous energy.'

The red pen came out and was firmly put through Archer's name. The rest, as they say, is history.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in