Bunhill: Making amends for sorry apology
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID JAMES has a problem. It is not Eagle Trust nor LEP Group nor one of the other companies like Dan-Air he has tried to rescue over the years, nor his elevation to the Council of Lloyd's that is causing him so much bother, but Tom Rubython, editor of Business Age magazine.
Rubython used to edit Management Week until he fell out with his backers and it closed. One of the reasons for the disagreement was the number of libel writs and complaints the magazine was attracting. One of the writs was from James's Dan-Air. The claim was settled but the magazine closed without paying the company's pounds 80,000 costs.
No sooner had Rubython started up again with Business Age than, said James, he also started attacking him again. Two articles about James led to letters from m'learned friends. One, in December 1992, claimed James, contained no less than 40 errors. An apology followed but it was not as fulsome as James demanded.
So the latest issue, out this week, contains a journalistic first: an apology for an apology. Thanks to further pressure from James's lawyers, it will say: 'Regrettably, the apology was not in terms previously agreed with Mr James. We would like to apologise to Mr James for this error.'
But if James thinks that is the last he has heard of Rubython, he should think again. A man who gives his occupation at Companies House as 'car dealer', has had a house repossessed by the building society, has seen two magazines go into receivership and recently made the astonishing revelation that Paul Raymond was Britain's richest man is used to bouncing back. Will he write about James again? 'We consider we're even. I suppose not.' Somehow, I doubt it.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments