Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bunhill: Easy rider

Dominic Prince
Saturday 24 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FOLLOWING my story last week about Lester Piggott and his riches, I thought it might interest readers to return to the subject of jockeys and how much they earn.

It would seem the answer is a very great deal, indeed - particularly if they are at the top of the tree.

Take, for instance, Pat Eddery, the flat race jockey. He appears to earn a terrific amount of money and must surely be one of the highest paid sportsmen in the UK, by Bunhill's reckoning.

When you consider that for much of the year a flat race jockey is not riding, the sums become even more fantastic.

In 1988 Eddery received nearly pounds 900,000 for what is termed in his accounts 'the provision of jockey services' (that is, riding horses). Then in 1992 his company, Patrick Eddery Ltd, reported a turnover of pounds 1.1m, with a retained profit of nearly pounds 700,000.

Piggott's legendary meaness may have been overtaken, for a note to Eddery's accounts reveals a charitable donation of pounds 350.

And what is this I spot? Note 12 states: 'A loan subsisted and was made to a director during the year which is in contravention of the Companies Act 1985.' Oh dear, oh dear.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in