Building societies win tax decision
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Three building societies may take action against the Government after the European Commission of Human Rights ruled that they had a valid case over being taxed twice.
The Leeds, National & Provincial and Yorkshire building societies were caught by retrospective legislation brought in after the Government lost a test case involving the Woolwich Building society.
The case involves the way that composite rate tax (CRT) was collected to account for tax owing on building society interest. This unified rate, that used to be set to reduce the standard rate to account for non-taxpayers who were also paying tax on theirinterest, was collected yearly based on the societies' accounts until 1996.
The system then switched to quarterly collection of tax based on interest actually paid to investors. Those societies whose year end did not match the financial year were subject to transitional arrangements from April 1986.
The Leeds is claiming £57m, N & P £15m and Yorkshire £9m. Woolwich Building Society took its case to the Lords and won repayment of £91m.
The Commission will try to persuade the Government to make a "friendly settlement'' but they could end up before the European courts. A Inland Revenue spokesman said: "We have nothing to say. We are considering the decision."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments