Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Building societies win tax decision

Vivien Goldsmith
Monday 16 January 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Three building societies may take action against the Government after the European Commission of Human Rights ruled that they had a valid case over being taxed twice.

The Leeds, National & Provincial and Yorkshire building societies were caught by retrospective legislation brought in after the Government lost a test case involving the Woolwich Building society.

The case involves the way that composite rate tax (CRT) was collected to account for tax owing on building society interest. This unified rate, that used to be set to reduce the standard rate to account for non-taxpayers who were also paying tax on theirinterest, was collected yearly based on the societies' accounts until 1996.

The system then switched to quarterly collection of tax based on interest actually paid to investors. Those societies whose year end did not match the financial year were subject to transitional arrangements from April 1986.

The Leeds is claiming £57m, N & P £15m and Yorkshire £9m. Woolwich Building Society took its case to the Lords and won repayment of £91m.

The Commission will try to persuade the Government to make a "friendly settlement'' but they could end up before the European courts. A Inland Revenue spokesman said: "We have nothing to say. We are considering the decision."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in