Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Builders lobby for contract bonds

Neil Thapar
Saturday 11 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITAIN'S top 10 construction companies, including Bovis, Costain and Mowlem, are campaigning for an American-style bonding scheme to reduce competition in the industry.

The group wants the Government to lay down guidelines that would force companies to buy bond cover for the full cost of any contracts which they tender for and win.

The lobbying is directed at Sir Michael Latham, the former Conservative MP, who is carrying out a wide-ranging inquiry into contract abuses and conflicts in the industry.

A detailed report from the inquiry, backed both by the industry and by Tony Baldry, the Environment minister, is expected to recommend sweeping changes to reduce conflict and litigation over contracts when it is published in the next two months.

The builders say that a bond scheme would help to cut down the number of competitive tenders for contracts and improve profit margins to more economic levels. They think the current free-for-all has damaged the industry's reputation.

In the United States, contractors normally have to provide customers with a bond, underwritten by financial institutions, covering the full value of work they hope to win.

If the builder is unable to complete the work, or runs into financial problems, the customer can call in the bond-issuer to fulfil the contract.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in