Keeping £2 bus fare cap would have cost a tenth of fuel duty freeze, says think tank
Campaigners say ‘bus tax’ will hit communities while freezing fuel duty encourages car usage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Keeping the £2 bus fare cap in England would only have cost a tenth of the money the government spent on freezing fuel duty, a leading think tank has said.
The cap would have cost £300m compared to the £3bn spent on the fuel duty freeze, according to the New Economics Foundation (NEF).
The existing cap was due to expire at the end of December while the new £3 cap, covering most bus journeys in England, will run until the end of 2025.
The cap was introduced after the pandemic to ease the cost of living crisis and also to encourage more public transport use. NEF has previously said that freezing fuel duty leads to more driving rather than public transport use, and thus more pollution.
Single bus fares in London with Transport for London will, however, remain at £1.75 and those in Greater Manchester at £2, after Andy Burnham, mayor of Greater Manchester, said he would keep the cap.
Campaigners have asked the mayor of West Yorkshire to keep the cap. Tracy Brabin said she would consider the plea. The region was the first to bring in a £2 fare cap in September 2022, with the government following its lead in January 2023.
“Access to affordable public transport shouldn’t be down to a regional lottery,” the think tank said.
“The cost of capping bus fares at £2 would have been tiny compared with keeping the fuel duty freeze. We should be incentivising public transport which would help reduce carbon emissions – rather than continuing with this regressive fuel duty cut.”
An extension of the fare cap was announced in 2023 with £300m of funding; £160m to local transport authorities to improve fares, services and infrastructure and £140m to go directly to operators to help protect essential services across England.
Transport secretary Louise Haigh said following the announcement: “Our bus revolution will give every community the power to take back control of their services, end the postcode lottery of services and turn the page on four decades of failed deregulation.”
The Liberal Democrats branded the change a “bus tax” that will hit small businesses and hold back economic growth.
Environment spokesperson Tim Farron said: “While this new government has been left to make difficult choices, they cannot allow the burden of fixing the Conservatives’ mess to be on people and small businesses across the country.
“The fundamental issue that neither Labour nor the Conservatives before them seemed to understand is that for rural communities, it doesn’t matter if the cap is £2 or £3 if they don’t have a bus service in the first place.”
Greenpeace condemned Sir Keir’s decision to hike the bus fare cap, saying it “makes no political, economical or environmental sense whatsoever”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments