Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BSC calls Lloyds payments illegal

John Willcock
Wednesday 25 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BUILDING Societies Commission yesterday condemned the pounds 1.8bn cash payments proposed by Lloyds Bank to Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society members as illegal, in the final day of the High Court hearing into the takeover, writes John Willcock.

Judgment will be handed down on Friday at the earliest, said the Vice Chancellor, Sir Donald Nicholls. It may be several weeks before it appears.

C&G brought the case against the BSC after the commission refused to sanction the Lloyds takeover.

Philip Heslop QC, for the BSC, said the payments, which would average about pounds 2,100 for each C&G member, fell foul of the 1986 Building Societies Act because they would be made by a third party rather than by the society.

The BSC claims that when the C&G's business is transferred to another body only the society may make such payments, since these are the only ones outlined by the Act.

On Tuesday, the first day of the hearing, counsel for C&G argued that because a process was not outlined by legislation did not mean that it was prohibited.

If the court gives the go- ahead to Lloyds, building societies may feel under pressure to merge or seek a buyer. If the Vice Chancellor upholds the BSC's position Lloyds will be forced to put together a new deal or withdraw.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in