Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brutality keeps companies on top, says management guru

Barrie Clement,Labour Editor
Sunday 03 October 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CONFLICT at work, even to the point of brutality, can be vital for company success, according to an American management guru.

In contrast to the trend towards 'family friendly' management, Richard Pascale, a business consultant, exalts the virtues of working 18 hours a day.

Writing in the latest issue of Personnel Management, Mr Pascale declares: 'Running scared seems to keep a company on the edge of performance.'

One of the companies he admires is Intel, an American group, which has no formal 'contention process' but has a very 'contention-prone culture'.

Intel is driven by the personal style of Andy Grove, president, who believes in a 'gloves off' approach, which at times can be brutal. Mr Pascale concedes that it has a combative form of discussion that most companies would not tolerate.

The American computer giant IBM is given as an example of a company where there is no such conflict and which has become complacent and lost market share as a consequence.

Companies like McDonalds, the hamburger chain, depended for their success on someone challenging accepted ideas about the future of the organisation and producing a 'radical new slant'.

Another company that has harnessed conflict successfully is Honda, Mr Pascale says. The Japanese car group runs 'straight, hard-hitting discussions in which rank doesn't matter'.

Occasionally there are 'extraordinary underdogs' that have become successful through the management of conflict. Mr Pascale mentions Nordstrom, the Seattle-based retailer, British Airways and the US television news broadcaster CNN, which reached for goals that initially seemed impossible.

Conflict is an inescapable part of life in complex organisations, he says. 'The choice you get to make is whether to ignore it, suppress it or harness it.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in