Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Breach of court order may force SFO to pulp report

Tom Stevenson Financial Editor
Thursday 17 July 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Serious Fraud Office faces new embarrassment after being forced to withdraw from sale and possibly destroy thousands of copies of its latest annual report. The SFO has also had to write to those who have already received copies of the report asking them to disregard a section that puts the office in the humiliating position of breaching a court order.

The SFO is currently deciding whether to pulp the remaining copies of its report or replace the offending page. The error was realised too late, however, to do anything about the many early copies of the report that had already been sent out to the press and others.

A letter from the red-faced fraud office has been sent to the report's recipients, reminding them they, too, are limited by the court's reporting restrictions. Because of this The Independent is unable to give any further details of the SFO's error.

However, the climbdown is a serious embarrassment for the SFO and its new director Rosalind Wright, who only took control of the office in April. It comes less than a week after Mrs Wright used the report to publicise a list of recommendations for changing the current system of prosecuting fraud and regulating the City.

This week's faux pas will have serious repercussions at the SFO if it undermines its credibility at the same time as it is calling for broader powers to combat the rising levels of financial fraud that it highlighted in its annual report. The report showed a sharp increase in the number of cases of suspected fraud against investors.

It is understood the error in the report slipped through because the court order it breaches was imposed after the completion of an early draft. The SFO failed to notice that it needed make a change before the final version was printed.

The embarrassment comes after a run of successful convictions by the SFO which appeared to be restoring its reputation. The office has come in for widespread criticism since its founding in 1988 after failing to secure convictions in a number of high-profile prosecutions.

In a letter to the Attorney- general on Monday, Mrs Wright called for the creation of a single investigatory body to replace the current system which sees responsibility for prosecuting fraud split between the SFO, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Department of Trade and Industry. She said it was time for recommendations made 11 years ago by Lord Roskill to be enacted.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in