Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bottom Line: Unfair to Wolseley

Wednesday 01 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BIGGEST surprise of Wolseley's decision to expand its photographic products division is that it was in the business in the first place.

But the acquisition of Calumet, the US distributor of its existing professional camera equipment manufacturer, is a logical, if peripheral, addition.

Paying pounds 28.2m for underlying operating profits of about pounds 4m looks a good price and the deal provides a useful element of vertical integration.

The market's reaction to yesterday's announcement of a pounds 55m placing at 748p to fund the deal, and then some, was telling. A fall in the share price from 779p to 764p followed a 20 per cent drop since the March peak at 975p.

Nevertheless, acquisitions in the past have served Wolseley shareholders well, as subscribers to the share issues of the past two years at 400p, 565p and 632p respectively will testify.

With profits expected to reach pounds 190m in the year to July, the shares trade on an annualised p/e of 15 for 1994. That is pricier than the market but cheaper than the other builders, which seems unfair for one of the sector's best companies. Good value.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in