Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bottom Line: Greenalls doubts

Monday 19 July 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

INSTITUTIONAL investors in Greenalls, the pub operator, are right to have concerns about the price their company is paying for JA Devenish, the smaller West Country publican.

It is most unlikely that the groundswell of opposition will be enough to block the deal at Thursday's special meeting, but that does not mean this little rebellion should be ignored.

Greenalls should really be looking to get 15 per cent out of Devenish to satisfy shareholders.

Including the assumption of pounds 40m of debt, Greenalls is paying pounds 250m for it. To get 15 per cent on pounds 250m, Greenalls will have to suck out pounds 37.5m of earnings.

As an independent, Devenish made pounds 9.5m after tax in the year to 30 September. In these terms Greenalls' task to make the acquisition pay is, to say the least, ambitious.

Greenalls says earnings will improve in year one, thanks to cost savings. But to satisfy its institutional shareholders it must not stop there.

Other aggressive acquirers should note the warning - make sure you can justify the terms.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in