Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bond agrees to appear before bankruptcy examination: Lawyers drop claims that the fallen Australian tycoon is unfit for court after suffering depression and brain damage

Robert Milliken
Tuesday 19 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AFTER months of delay, during which he claimed that he was suffering from brain damage, depression and a fallen IQ, Alan Bond, the bankrupt Australian tycoon, changed his mind yesterday and agreed to appear before an examination of his bankruptcy.

Mr Bond, 55, who once controlled an international brewing, media and property empire, has been fighting an order to undergo an examination by his trustee in bankruptcy and by the liquidator of his former private company, Dallhold Investments. Once one of Australia's richest men, with a personal fortune estimated at Adollars 350m (pounds 175m), Mr Bond was declared bankrupt two years ago. Mr Bond has personal debts estimated at Adollars 500m. His large legal bills and travel expenses appear to be met by family and friends.

Robert Ramsay, the bankruptcy trustee, is seeking to locate the whereabouts of Mr Bond's assets in order to pay creditors. A week ago, Mr Bond's lawyers told the Federal Court that he did not have the mental capacity to appear before the bankruptcy examination. They said he had suffered brain damage caused by open-heart surgery in February 1993, and his IQ had fallen from a 'superior/very superior' level to less than average. His concentration, memory and speech were also impaired.

Mr Justice Ian Sheppard challenged their arguments, and said Mr Bond was sufficiently well to be able to maintain a solicitor and a counsel. In February, Mr Bond's counsel presented the judge with a psychiatric report that claimed that Mr Bond had become overwhelmed by his legal and personal problems, the collapse of his marriage and the loss of his empire, and had been in a state of severe depression for a year. At that time, Mr Bond had been admitted to a private hospital in his home city of Perth, where he was being treated with Prozac, an anti-depressant.

The report by a Perth psychiatrist said: 'He cries more often than previously and is persistently irritable and annoyed. He has lost interest in social activities and has greater difficulty in making decisions than previously . . . He has also associated significant short-term memory difficulties. His irritation has extended into agitation and rage and he has lost his temper a number of times. He repeatedly feels that he is unable to go on.'

When the Federal Court assembled yesterday, expecting to hear more evidence from medical experts about Mr Bond's mental state, Michael Barnett, his counsel, made a surprise announcement that Mr Bond had changed his mind and was now prepared to undergo the bankruptcy examination. He said that enough had been published about Mr Bond's intimate personal and private details, and that he wanted to spare his family and friends further 'close scrutiny'. He also wanted to avoid further costs to himself and his liquidator and to make it clear that he had no wish to avoid scrutiny of his public affairs.

Mr Bond is now due to appear before the examination next month to answer wide-ranging questions about his business dealings in the 1980s.

(Graph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in