Bomb premium rises to go ahead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Government is to push ahead with immediate large rises in terrorism insurance premiums, despite an outcry from insurers and industry.
Neil Hamilton, the corporate affairs minister, telephoned Ian Rushton, chairman of the Association of British Insurers, yesterday to tell him a new schedule of premium rates must be introduced from 1 July. The insurers had thought the Government was backing down on its demands, which it is feared could lead insurance costs in the City of London to rise by up to 300 per cent.
A Department of Trade and Industry spokeswoman said some businesses in the provinces would see premiums fall. Insurance costs for large buildings will still be less than 1 per cent of total occupancy costs.
But the ABI, the Confederation of British Industry and others fear a premium hike may be counter-productive because it will encourage more companies to go without insurance.
Some 20-30 per cent of businesses in London and other large cities are already taking the risk of not insuring against terrorism, and in the provinces the proportion without protection rises to 70 per cent or more.
The Government is exposed to the estimated pounds 400m cost of last month's Bishopsgate bomb attack because of its agreement with the insurance industry under which it will meet the bulk of the costs above and beyond the pool of terrorist insurance premiums collected by Pool Re, a specially created reinsurance company.
Pool Re is expected to receive terrorist premiums of little more than pounds 200m, much less, it is believed, than civil servants promised ministers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments