Body Shop in protest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Body Shop will tomorrow launch a fresh attack on its competitors in the cosmetics industry by asking its customers to sign a massive petition backing a Europe-wide ban on animal testing.
The company plans to collect six million names from customers at its 750 shops across Europe. Animal testing "is morally wrong and totally unnecessary," said founder Anita Roddick.
The petition will be presented to Jacques Santer, president of the European Commission, in November. Activists fear Mr Santer is about to postpone enforcement of the ban, scheduled to take effect in January.
Ms Roddick will kick off the campaign - supported by the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and the International Fund for Animal Welfare - by hand-delivering a letter to the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Perfumery Association, the main industry lobby group, tomorrow.
She will also reveal a new MORI poll, which is expected to reveal that almost three-quarters of UK residents support a ban on animal testing.
Ms Roddick said new laws are necessary because some cosmetics companies are misleading their customers. While they claim their products have not been tested on animals, they do not vouch for tests on ingredients made by their suppliers.
Body Shop relies on ingredients with a historical safety record, albeit often based on animal tests, and those that have been subjected to modern alternatives such as the Eytex/Irritection test. Eytex, a test-tube method of checking for eye irritation, is designed to replace the Draize test in which substances are dripped into rabbits' eyes.
Opponents of a ban say they will use non-animal tests when they compare favourably on both accuracy and price. They fear that a blanket ban would stifle product development.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments