Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blair seeks to water down employment proposals

Barrie Clement
Tuesday 06 April 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE PRIME MINISTER is trying to water down radical proposals which would effectively force all 1.3 million British companies to establish disciplinary procedures to deal with errant staff.

Employers have told Tony Blair that the code of practice which accompanies the Employment Relations Bill would place unacceptable burdens on business.

The Bill gives employees the right to be accompanied by a trade union official at disciplinary hearings, where such a mechanism exists.

Controversially, the code will advise employment tribunals to take a dim view of companies that fail to establish such procedures.

Business leaders, including Rupert Murdoch, have registered deep misgivings about the whole initiative, which they believe will strangle industry in red tape. They contend that it will be far more difficult to get rid of troublemakers and employees who are simply incompetent.

Business representatives, however, have failed to dilute a clause that stops employers dismissing strikers for the first eight weeks of industrial action. Companies wanted the period reduced to four weeks, but Ian McCartney, Trade Minister, successfully resisted the intervention.

Mr McCartney argued that ministers should not try to re-open negotiations on the proposals, which led to conflict inside the Government and damaged relations with trade unions.

Employees' representatives have warned that the unions' continued financial support of the Labour Party was being put in jeopardy.

Meanwhile, the Low Pay Commission may be asked to reconsider the amount allowed for tied accommodation where an employee is paid the national minimum wage of pounds 3.60 per hour, introduced last Thursday.

Employers believe that pounds 20.00 per week for housing is too little, although the Commission has so far resisted attempts to increase it.

Mr Blair is also keen to alter the way in which the European working time directive has been implemented. Businesses have been critical of the requirement to keep detailed time records of staff who have agreed to work more than 48 hours per week.

The Prime Minister has become increasingly persuaded that the combination of European employment law and home-grown legislation on union recognition may be difficult for businesses to cope with. Downing Street is also conscious that New Labour's business-friendly image may be tarnished.

Acting through Lord Falconer, a Cabinet Office minister, Mr Blair has sought amendments to the Employment Relations Bill as it passes through Parliament.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in