Best and worst: Capital Shares of Split Trusts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE CAPITAL shares of split-capital investment trusts tend to be highly geared - any movement in the stock market, either up or down, is greatly amplified, writes Caroline Merrell.
The high levels of the UK stock market at the end of last year and the beginning of this mean that, on average, pounds 100 invested in such a trust a year ago would now be worth pounds 133 - pounds 3 more than pounds 100 so invested five years ago.
Whitechurch Securities, an independent financial adviser based in Bristol, runs a fund that is entirely invested in the capital shares of split- capital investment trusts. The fund has performed spectacularly well since it was launched and Kean Seagar, the company's managing director, believes this will continue. 'Obviously capital shares are very volatile - they exaggerate market movements. But we are in the recovery phase of the economic cycle and over the long term they will do well.'
Abbey Life Investment Services manages the Yeoman investment trust. Michael Yeo, Abbey Life manager, said the fund had performed well over the last year because the board of directors had decided to decrease its exposure to equities at the start of 1994.
Deirdre Nash, fund manager at River & Mercantile American-Cap, said the fund's performance had been held back by demand for high income on the fund's income- bearing shares. She said this had meant the fund had to be more weighted to fixed-interest securities, which had held back capital growth.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments